| Autor: |
Alba Massolo |
| Jazyk: |
English<br />Spanish; Castilian<br />French<br />Portuguese |
| Rok vydání: |
2024 |
| Předmět: |
|
| Zdroj: |
Principia: An International Journal of Epistemology, Vol 28, Iss 1 (2024) |
| Druh dokumentu: |
article |
| ISSN: |
1808-1711 |
| DOI: |
10.5007/1808-1711.2024.e96708 |
| Popis: |
In this paper, I present a formal reconstruction of the classical argument for fatalism set forth by Aristotle in On Interpretation 9. From there, I expose two different formal solutions for avoiding the unwanted conclusion based on the traditional interpretation of Aristotle’s rejection of the Principle of Bivalence: On the one hand, Łukasiewicz's three-valued logic and, on the other hand, supervaluation semantics. I also address some criticisms made against these two proposals. To finish, I remark on some alternative interpretations of Aristotle’s intentions maintaining that the Stagirite philosopher rejected fatalism without abandoning the Principle of Bivalence. |
| Databáze: |
Directory of Open Access Journals |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
