| Autor: |
Elise Beijer, Vincent P.W. Scholtes, J. Hillian Nederhoed, Rutger J. Lely, Arjan W.J. Hoksbergen |
| Jazyk: |
angličtina |
| Rok vydání: |
2022 |
| Předmět: |
|
| Zdroj: |
EJVES Vascular Forum, Vol 55, Iss , Pp 38-41 (2022) |
| Druh dokumentu: |
article |
| ISSN: |
2666-688X |
| DOI: |
10.1016/j.ejvsvf.2022.03.004 |
| Popis: |
Introduction: Endovascular treatment of an aortic stump rupture is technically feasible. Whether this is a definitive treatment or a bridge to further surgery is unknown. Report: Previously a Case of an aortic stump rupture following extra-anatomic repair of a recurrent aortoduodenal fistula (ADF), which was successfully treated endovascularly by placement of an Amplatzer® Vascular Plug was described. The patient survived this acute procedure, but four years later was admitted with fever and back pain. Imaging revealed progressive enlargement of the aortic stump. A re-exploration was performed with removal of the infected aortic stump including the Amplatzer plug. A new aortic stump was created together with resection of an adherent part of the duodenum. The patient was discharged after five months and was able to survive for two more years without any recurring vascular complications. Discussion: This Case demonstrates that after four years, endovascular treatment was not a definitive treatment for aortic stump rupture. Endovascular treatment should be followed by definitive treatment when the patient is fit for surgery, especially in cases of ADF. If the patient is unfit for surgery, conservative treatment with culture based antibiotics is a reasonable alternative. Positive obstinacy lengthened the survival of this patient with eight years of reasonably good quality life. |
| Databáze: |
Directory of Open Access Journals |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
