RRM1 and ERCC1 as biomarkers in patients with locally advanced and metastatic malignant pleural mesothelioma treated with continuous infusion of low-dose gemcitabine plus cisplatin

Autor: Wendy Muñoz-Montaño, Sae Muñiz-Hernández, Alejandro Avilés-Salas, Rodrigo Catalán, Luis Lara-Mejía, Suraj Samtani-Bassarmal, Andres F. Cardona, Jorge Mendoza-Desión, Daniel Hernández-Cueto, Altagracia Maldonado, Guillermina Baay-Guzmán, Sara Huerta-Yepes, Oscar Arrieta
Jazyk: angličtina
Rok vydání: 2021
Předmět:
Zdroj: BMC Cancer, Vol 21, Iss 1, Pp 1-11 (2021)
Druh dokumentu: article
ISSN: 1471-2407
DOI: 10.1186/s12885-021-08287-5
Popis: Abstract Background Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma (MPM) is a rare but aggressive neoplasia that usually presents at advanced stages. Even though some advances have been achieved in the management of patients with MPM, this malignancy continuous to impose a deleterious prognosis for affected patients (12–18 months as median survival, and 5–10% 5-year survival rate), accordingly, the recognition of biomarkers that allow us to select the most appropriate therapy are necessary. Methods Immunohistochemistry semi-quantitative analysis was performed to evaluate four different biomarkers (ERCC1, RRM1, RRM2, and hENT-1) with the intent to explore if any of them was useful to predict response to treatment with continuous infusion gemcitabine plus cisplatin. Tissue biopsies from patients with locally advanced or metastatic MPM were analyzed to quantitatively asses the aforementioned biomarkers. Every included patient received treatment with low-dose gemcitabine (250 mg/m2) in a 6-h continuous infusion plus cisplatin 35 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks as first-line therapy. Results From the 70 eligible patients, the mean and standard deviation (SD) for ERCC1, RRM1, RRM2 and hENT-1 were 286,178.3 (± 219, 019.8); 104,647.1 (± 65, 773.4); 4536.5 (± 5, 521.3); and 2458.7 (± 4, 983.4), respectively. Patients with high expression of RRM1 had an increased median PFS compared with those with lower expression (9.5 vs 4.8 months, p =
Databáze: Directory of Open Access Journals