Investigating the impact of primary care networks on continuity of care in English general practice: Analysis of interviews with patients and clinicians from a mixed methods study

Autor: Mhorag Goff, Sally Jacobs, Jonathan Hammond, Ali Hindi, Kath Checkland
Jazyk: angličtina
Rok vydání: 2024
Předmět:
Zdroj: Health Expectations, Vol 27, Iss 2, Pp n/a-n/a (2024)
Druh dokumentu: article
ISSN: 1369-7625
1369-6513
DOI: 10.1111/hex.14032
Popis: Abstract Introduction In England, primary care networks (PCNs) offer opportunities to improve access to and sustainability of general practice through collaboration between groups of practices to provide care with a broader range of practitioner roles. However, there are concerns that these changes may undermine continuity of care. Our study investigates what the organisational shift to PCNs means for continuity of care. Methods The paper uses thematic analysis of qualitative data from interviews with general practitioners and other healthcare professionals (HCPs, n = 33) in 19 practices in five PCNs, and their patients (n = 35). Three patient cohorts within each participating practice were recruited, based on anticipated higher or lower needs for continuity of care: patients over 65 years with polypharmacy, patients with anxiety or depression and ‘working age’ adults aged between 18 and 45 years. Findings Patients and clinicians perceived changes to continuity in PCNs in our study. Larger‐scale care provision in PCNs required better care coordination and information‐sharing processes, aimed at improving care for ‘vulnerable’ patients in target groups. However, new working arrangements and ways of delivering care in PCNs undermine HCPs' ability to maintain continuity through ongoing relationships with patients. Patients experience this in terms of reduced availability of their preferred clinician, inefficiencies in care and unfamiliarity of new staff, roles and processes. Conclusions New practitioners need to be effectively integrated to support effective team‐based care. However, for patients, especially those not deemed ‘vulnerable’, this may not be sufficient to counter the loss of relationship with their practice. Therefore, caution is required in relation to designating patients as in need of, or not in need of continuity. Rather, continuity for all patients could be maintained through a dynamic understanding of the need for it as fluctuating and situational and by supporting clinicians to provide follow‐up care. Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) A PPI group was recruited and consulted during the study for feedback on the study design, recruitment materials and interpretation of findings.
Databáze: Directory of Open Access Journals
Externí odkaz:
Nepřihlášeným uživatelům se plný text nezobrazuje