Comparison of using two LCA software programs to assess the environmental impacts of two institutional buildings
| Autor: | Chang Gu, Homgmei Gu, Meng Gong, Janet Blackadar, Nadia Zahabi |
|---|---|
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Rok vydání: | 2024 |
| Předmět: | |
| Zdroj: | Sustainable Structures, Vol 4, Iss 1 (2024) |
| Druh dokumentu: | article |
| ISSN: | 2789-3111 2789-312X 51783657 |
| DOI: | 10.54113/j.sust.2024.000034 |
| Popis: | The current trends in climate change have captured the attention of stakeholders across multiple industries, including the building sector. With the introduction of innovative building materials such as mass timber products (MTPs), it has become essential to evaluate their environmental performance. In response, a variety of life cycle assessment (LCA) software programs are available to meet this need. However, it is crucial to understand how different LCA software and databases might influence the results. This study was aimed at exploring the impact of two widely used LCA software programs, SimaPro and Athena Impact Estimator, on LCA results. Two buildings were employed to conduct this study, a traditional institutional building and a mass timber building currently under construction. By comparing the numerical outputs from both software programs, it was discovered that while both could reach similar conclusions regarding the environmental impacts of a building, their use is limited to comparative purposes only. The software programs produced distinct numerical values in their outputs and attributed the sources of impacts differently, indicating they cannot be used interchangeably. However, either SimaPro or Athena Impact Estimator was suitable for estimating the global warming potential of a building during stages A1 to A3. |
| Databáze: | Directory of Open Access Journals |
| Externí odkaz: |
|