| Popis: |
Abstract With the increase in the generation and spread of textual content on social media, natural language processing (NLP) has become an important area of research for detecting underlying threats, racial abuse, violence, and implied warnings in the content. The subtlety and ambiguity of language make the development of effective models for detecting threats in text a challenging task. This task is further complicated when the threat is not explicitly conveyed. This study focuses on the task of implied threat detection using an explicitly designed machine-generated dataset with both linguistic and lexical features. We evaluated the performance of different machine learning algorithms on these features including Support Vector Machines, Logistic Regression, Naive Bayes, Decision Tree, and K-nearest neighbors. The ensembling approaches of Adaboost, Random Forest, and Gradient Boosting were also explored. Deep learning modeling was performed using Long Short-Term Memory, Deep Neural Networks (DNN), and Bidirectional Long Short-Term Memory (BiLSTM). Based on the evaluation, it was observed that classical and ensemble models overfit while working with linguistic features. The performance of these models improved when working with lexical features. The model based on logistic regression exhibited superior performance with an F 1 score of 77.13%. While experimenting with deep learning models, DNN achieved an F 1 score of 91.49% while the BiLSTM achieved an F 1 score of 91.61% while working with lexical features. The current study provides a baseline for future research in the domain of implied threat detection. |
Full text from SpringerLink