Comparison of Seven Non-Linear Mixed Effect Model-Based Approaches to Test for Treatment Effect

Autor: Estelle Chasseloup, Mats O. Karlsson
Jazyk: angličtina
Rok vydání: 2023
Předmět:
Zdroj: Pharmaceutics, Vol 15, Iss 2, p 460 (2023)
Druh dokumentu: article
ISSN: 15020460
1999-4923
DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics15020460
Popis: Analyses of longitudinal data with non-linear mixed-effects models (NLMEM) are typically associated with high power, but sometimes at the cost of inflated type I error. Approaches to overcome this problem were published recently, such as model-averaging across drug models (MAD), individual model-averaging (IMA), and combined Likelihood Ratio Test (cLRT). This work aimed to assess seven NLMEM approaches in the same framework: treatment effect assessment in balanced two-armed designs using real natural history data with or without the addition of simulated treatment effect. The approaches are MAD, IMA, cLRT, standard model selection (STDs), structural similarity selection (SSs), randomized cLRT (rcLRT), and model-averaging across placebo and drug models (MAPD). The assessment included type I error, using Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale-cognitive (ADAS-cog) scores from 817 untreated patients and power and accuracy in the treatment effect estimates after the addition of simulated treatment effects. The model selection and averaging among a set of pre-selected candidate models were driven by the Akaike information criteria (AIC). The type I error rate was controlled only for IMA and rcLRT; the inflation observed otherwise was explained by the placebo model misspecification and selection bias. Both IMA and rcLRT had reasonable power and accuracy except under a low typical treatment effect.
Databáze: Directory of Open Access Journals
Externí odkaz:
Nepřihlášeným uživatelům se plný text nezobrazuje