Preferences for Artificial Intelligence Clinicians Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Discrete Choice Experiment and Propensity Score Matching Study

Autor: Liu, Taoran, Tsang, Winghei, Xie, Yifei, Tian, Kang, Huang, Fengqiu, Chen, Yanhui, Lau, Oiying, Feng, Guanrui, Du, Jianhao, Chu, Bojia, Shi, Tingyu, Zhao, Junjie, Cai, Yiming, Hu, Xueyan, Akinwunmi, Babatunde, Huang, Jian, Zhang, Casper J P, Ming, Wai-Kit
Jazyk: angličtina
Rok vydání: 2021
Předmět:
Zdroj: Journal of Medical Internet Research, Vol 23, Iss 3, p e26997 (2021)
Druh dokumentu: article
ISSN: 1438-8871
DOI: 10.2196/26997
Popis: BackgroundArtificial intelligence (AI) methods can potentially be used to relieve the pressure that the COVID-19 pandemic has exerted on public health. In cases of medical resource shortages caused by the pandemic, changes in people’s preferences for AI clinicians and traditional clinicians are worth exploring. ObjectiveWe aimed to quantify and compare people’s preferences for AI clinicians and traditional clinicians before and during the COVID-19 pandemic, and to assess whether people’s preferences were affected by the pressure of pandemic. MethodsWe used the propensity score matching method to match two different groups of respondents with similar demographic characteristics. Respondents were recruited in 2017 and 2020. A total of 2048 respondents (2017: n=1520; 2020: n=528) completed the questionnaire and were included in the analysis. Multinomial logit models and latent class models were used to assess people’s preferences for different diagnosis methods. ResultsIn total, 84.7% (1115/1317) of respondents in the 2017 group and 91.3% (482/528) of respondents in the 2020 group were confident that AI diagnosis methods would outperform human clinician diagnosis methods in the future. Both groups of matched respondents believed that the most important attribute of diagnosis was accuracy, and they preferred to receive combined diagnoses from both AI and human clinicians (2017: odds ratio [OR] 1.645, 95% CI 1.535-1.763; P
Databáze: Directory of Open Access Journals
Externí odkaz:
Nepřihlášeným uživatelům se plný text nezobrazuje