Systematic review and meta-analysis of in situ versus composite bimammary coronary artery bypass grafting: immediate outcomes and 30-day mortality
| Autor: | S. T. Enginoev, D. A. Kondratyev, G. M. Magomedov, S. S. Ekimov, A. A. Zenkov, А. P. Motreva, B. K. Kadyraliev, I. I. Chernov, D. G. Tarasov |
|---|---|
| Jazyk: | ruština |
| Rok vydání: | 2021 |
| Předmět: | |
| Zdroj: | Российский кардиологический журнал, Vol 26, Iss 2S (2021) |
| Druh dokumentu: | article |
| ISSN: | 1560-4071 2618-7620 |
| DOI: | 10.15829/1560-4071-2021-4504 |
| Popis: | Aim. To compare the immediate outcomes and 30-day mortality of in situ bimammary coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) using two internal thoracic arteries (ITAs) versus a composite grafting.Material and methods. We searched PubMed, Google Scholar, and Web of Science databases for a period from 1990 to 2020 for studies comparing in situ bimammary CABG versus composite grafts. The PICO search model was used as follows: patient, intervention, comparison, outcomes. The data were derived by two independent researchers and subjected to a meta-analysis using a random effect.Results. A total of 10 studies were selected for this meta-analysis. Of these, there were 2 randomized controlled trials (n=705), 4 observational propensity score matching studies (n=4267) and 4 unadjusted observational studies (n=3517). With both ITA in situ surgery, fewer distal anastomoses are applied (MD=0,23; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0,15-0,32; p |
| Databáze: | Directory of Open Access Journals |
| Externí odkaz: |
|