| Popis: |
Objective To compare the safety and efficacy of transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) and laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (LaTME) for middle and low rectal cancer. Methods This study searched the clinical studies systematically comparing the short-term efficacy of TaTME and LaTME published in PubMed, Web of Science, CNKI, China Biology Medicine disc and Wanfang medical database. Systematic reviews and meta-analysis were conducted to base on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Evaluation and Meta-Analysis. Fixed-effects model or random-effects model was used for evaluation of data. Parameters of outcome evaluation included operation time, intraoperative blood loss, tumor size, conversion rate, length of hospital stay, number of lymph node dissection, distance of rectal lesion from anal verge, positive rate of distal resection margin(DRM), positive rate of circumferential resection margin(CRM), and postoperative complications. Results Nine studies with 1 of randomized controlled trial and 8 of prospective study were included to compare the outcomes of 451 TaTME and 438 LaTME in middle and low rectal cancer. TaTME had a significantly lower rate of conversion to open surgery (RR=0.13, P=0.002) and a lower DRM positive rate(RR=0.17, P |
