Trace amine-associated receptor 1 (TAAR1) agonism for psychosis: a living systematic review and meta-analysis of human and non-human data [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]

Autor: Fiona J. Ramage, Spyridon Siafis, Edoardo G. Ostinelli, Virginia Chiocchia, Claire Stansfield, Simonne Wright, Ioannis Mantas, Damian Omari Juma, Grazia Rutigliano, Oliver D. Howes, Francesca Tinsdeall, Lea Milligan, Claire Friedrich, Julian H. Elliott, Carmen Moreno, Ava Homiar, James Thomas, Emily S. Sena, Malcolm R. Macleod, Charlotte Austin, Nobuyuki Nomura, Jaycee Kennett, Soraya Seedat, Luke J. Vano, Andrea Cipriani, Olena Maksym, Jennifer Potts, David Gilbert, Thomy Tonia, Robert A. McCutcheon, Matthias Egger, Stefan Leucht, Toshi A. Furukawa, Hossein Dehdarirad, Janna Hastings, Susan Michie, Georgia Salanti, Olufisayo Elugbadebo, Ouma Simple
Jazyk: angličtina
Rok vydání: 2024
Předmět:
Zdroj: Wellcome Open Research, Vol 9 (2024)
Druh dokumentu: article
ISSN: 2398-502X
DOI: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.21302.1
Popis: Background Trace amine-associated receptor 1 (TAAR1) agonism shows promise for treating psychosis, prompting us to synthesise data from human and non-human studies. Methods We co-produced a living systematic review of controlled studies examining TAAR1 agonists in individuals (with or without psychosis/schizophrenia) and relevant animal models. Two independent reviewers identified studies in multiple electronic databases (until 17.11.2023), extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. Primary outcomes were standardised mean differences (SMD) for overall symptoms in human studies and hyperlocomotion in animal models. We also examined adverse events and neurotransmitter signalling. We synthesised data with random-effects meta-analyses. Results Nine randomised trials provided data for two TAAR1 agonists (ulotaront and ralmitaront), and 15 animal studies for 10 TAAR1 agonists. Ulotaront and ralmitaront demonstrated few differences compared to placebo in improving overall symptoms in adults with acute schizophrenia (N=4 studies, n=1291 participants; SMD=0.15, 95%CI: -0.05, 0.34), and ralmitaront was less efficacious than risperidone (N=1, n=156, SMD=-0.53, 95%CI: -0.86, -0.20). Large placebo response was observed in ulotaront phase-III trials. Limited evidence suggested a relatively benign side-effect profile for TAAR1 agonists, although nausea and sedation were common after a single dose of ulotaront. In animal studies, TAAR1 agonists improved hyperlocomotion compared to control (N=13 studies, k=41 experiments, SMD=1.01, 95%CI: 0.74, 1.27), but seemed less efficacious compared to dopamine D2 receptor antagonists (N=4, k=7, SMD=-0.62, 95%CI: -1.32, 0.08). Limited human and animal data indicated that TAAR1 agonists may regulate presynaptic dopaminergic signalling. Conclusions TAAR1 agonists may be less efficacious than dopamine D2 receptor antagonists already licensed for schizophrenia. The results are preliminary due to the limited number of drugs examined, lack of longer-term data, publication bias, and assay sensitivity concerns in trials associated with large placebo response. Considering their unique mechanism of action, relatively benign side-effect profile and ongoing drug development, further research is warranted. Registration PROSPERO-ID:CRD42023451628.
Databáze: Directory of Open Access Journals