Short-Form HIV Disability Questionnaire Sensibility, Utility, and Implementation Considerations in Community-Based Settings: A Mixed Methods Study

Autor: Kelly K. O’Brien PhD, PT, Francisco Ibáñez-Carrasco PhD, Patricia Solomon PhD, PT, Soo Chan Carusone PhD, Ann Stewart MD, MSc, Ahmed M. Bayoumi MD, MSc, FRCPC, Darren A. Brown FCSP, BSc, MSc, MRes, Adria Quigley PhD, MScPT, BSc, Puja Ahluwalia MPH, PT, Kristine M. Erlandson MD, MS, Jaime H. Vera MD, PhD, Colm Bergin MD, FRCPI, FRCP, FIDSA, FFSEM, FFPHMI, DLQ, Steven E. Hanna PhD, Marilyn Swinton MSc, BSc, Brittany Torres MScPT, Kiera McDuff MScPT, BSc, George Da Silva BA, Glen Bradford, Shaz Islam BA, Colleen Price BA, BSocSc, Joanne D. Lindsay MES, Carolann Murray BScPT, PT, Natalia McClellan BA, Katrina Krizmancic BA, Praney Anand, Tammy Yates M.Phil, BA, Rosalind Baltzer Turje RN, MA, Patrick McDougall MPublic Admin, BA, Vladislava Vlatka Maksimcev RecTher, Richard Harding PhD
Jazyk: angličtina
Rok vydání: 2023
Předmět:
Zdroj: Journal of the International Association of Providers of AIDS Care, Vol 22 (2023)
Druh dokumentu: article
ISSN: 2325-9582
23259582
DOI: 10.1177/23259582231210801
Popis: Purpose: We assessed the sensibility, utility, and implementation considerations of the Short-Form HIV Disability Questionnaire (SF-HDQ) in community-based settings. Methods: We conducted a mixed-methods study with adults living with HIV and community providers in seven community sites in Canada. We administered the SF-HDQ, a sensibility questionnaire and conducted semi-structured interviews. The SF-HDQ was sensible if median scores were ≥5/7(adults living with HIV) and ≥4/7(community providers) for ≥80% of the sensibility questionnaire items. Qualitative interview data were analyzed using content analysis. Results: Median sensibility scores were ≥5 for adults living with HIV (n = 44) and ≥4 for community providers (n = 10) for 95% and 100% of items, respectively. The SF-HDQ is comprehensive, represented disability, captured its episodic nature, and was easy to complete. Community utility included: facilitating communication and engagement with community; taking a snapshot of disability and tracking changes over time; guiding referrals; fostering self-reflection; and informing community programs. Considerations for implementation included flexible, person-centered approaches to mode and processes of administration, and communicating scores based on personal preferences among persons living with HIV. Conclusion: The SF-HDQ possesses sensibility and utility for use in community-based settings.
Databáze: Directory of Open Access Journals