| Popis: |
Over the past decade, biophilic architecture has been widely developed across the Asia–Pacific region. However, there is a notable lack of research based on online public reviews focusing on mid- to high-rise biophilic buildings, especially quantitative studies combining traditional architectural design features. This study aims to fill this gap by analyzing the typical floor plans and online public reviews of nine renowned biophilic buildings in the Asia–Pacific region. Using space syntax and natural language processing tools, the design features of typical floor plans and public feedback will be analyzed separately, and their correlation will be evaluated. Additionally, the content of negative and low-score reviews will be categorized to identify issues in current biophilic building designs. The findings suggest that biophilic design can stimulate widespread public discussion, with large direct blue–green elements receiving overwhelming attention. However, biophilic elements can also lead to negative sentiments due to factors like humidity, high temperatures, mold, and insects. This study provides insights and design recommendations for future biophilic buildings, demonstrating the value of biophilic design in public reviews and emphasizing the need to balance these factors to enhance public satisfaction and acceptance. |
