Autor: |
Engin Turkay Yilmaz, Ibrahim Mehmet Goymen, Melih Oral, Ozan Tuncay, Gokay Dursun, Egemen Turhan, Ahmet Mazhar Tokgozoglu |
Jazyk: |
angličtina |
Rok vydání: |
2024 |
Předmět: |
|
Zdroj: |
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, Vol 19, Iss 1, Pp 1-6 (2024) |
Druh dokumentu: |
article |
ISSN: |
1749-799X |
DOI: |
10.1186/s13018-024-04612-3 |
Popis: |
Abstract Background Current treatment options for patellofemoral (PF) instability have required functional scoring systems. The Banff Patellar Instability Instrument (BPII) 2.0 and Norwich Patellar Instability (NPI) scores were explicitly created to meet the need to evaluate PF instability. Different patient-reported outcome measurements (PROMs) are used to evaluate anterior knee problems. Objectives To test the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the BPII 2.0 and NPI score. Study design and methods Fifty-one patients that operated for PF instability, older than eighteen years old, were included in this study. Turkish translation of the BPII 2.0 and NPI scores was undertaken through translation into Turkish by an independent translator. Two tests were repeated seven days apart. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used for test–retest reliability. Internal consistency was analyzed using Cronbach's alpha. Validity was assessed by correlating the Kujala and Lysholm knee scores. Results Fifty-one patients (34 females/17 males), the average age was 25 ± 7, were included in this study. Cronbach's alpha value was 0.829 for BPII 2.0 and 0.843 for NPI for the first time answered by patients. ICC values applied to evaluate test–retest reliability were 0.904 (p |
Databáze: |
Directory of Open Access Journals |
Externí odkaz: |
|
Nepřihlášeným uživatelům se plný text nezobrazuje |
K zobrazení výsledku je třeba se přihlásit.
|