What's the Difference, Still? A Follow up Methodological Review of the Distance Education Research
Autor: | Justus J. RANDOLPH |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Rok vydání: | 2007 |
Předmět: | |
Zdroj: | Informatics in Education, Vol 6, Iss 1, Pp 179-188 (2007) |
Druh dokumentu: | article |
ISSN: | 1648-5831 2335-8971 |
DOI: | 10.15388/infedu.2007.12 |
Popis: | A high quality review of the distance learning literature from 1992-1999 concluded that most of the research on distance learning had serious methodological flaws. This paper presents the results of a small-scale replication of that review. A sample of 66 articles was drawn from three leading distance education journals. Those articles were categorized by study type, and the experimental or quasi-experimental articles were analyzed in terms of their research methodologies. The results indicated that the sample of post-1999 articles had the same methodological flaws as the sample of pre-1999 articles: most participants were not randomly selected, extraneous variables and reactive effects were not controlled for, and the validity and reliability of measures were not reported. |
Databáze: | Directory of Open Access Journals |
Externí odkaz: |