Skeptical Theism and Cognitive limitations of Humanity
| Autor: | Fatemeا Saeedi, AbdolRasoul Kashfi, AmirAbbas Alizamani |
|---|---|
| Jazyk: | English<br />Persian |
| Rok vydání: | 2020 |
| Předmět: | |
| Zdroj: | Journal of Philosophical Investigations, Vol 14, Iss 30, Pp 122-141 (2020) |
| Druh dokumentu: | article |
| ISSN: | 2251-7960 2423-4419 |
| DOI: | 10.22034/jpiut.2020.37483.2479 |
| Popis: | “Parent analogy” is one of the important arguments that was suggested by Stephen Wykstra, one of the prominent philosopher of Skeptical Theism. By formulating this argument, Wykstra shows that like infant who doesn’t understand reasons of her parent who permit suffering for her, Human being also cannot understand reasons of God who permits suffering. According to this we cannot infer from not seeing the reasons of God to there is no reason for God. Therefore, evidential argument from evil fails. Bruce Russell, William Rowe and Trent Dougherty challenge “parent analogy”. They offer “loving parent analogy” instead. “Loving parent” never leave their child alone in suffering or at least they make clear that there is reason. In their view, if theism is true, it`s expecting that this world be a transparent one and we can understand God`s reasons. In this article we show that parent analogy confront limitations which shows that it can be used neither for Skeptical Theism nor against it. But we show that there are other ways to justify cognitive limitations of human being. For example Alston instead of appeal to parent analogy, offer other analogies and enumerate at least six limitations for human beings. Accordingly, we can say that the claim of cognitive limitation form the view of Skeptical Theism is justified |
| Databáze: | Directory of Open Access Journals |
| Externí odkaz: |
|