| Popis: |
Climate classification plays a fundamental role in understanding climatic patterns, particularly in the context of a changing climate. This study utilized hourly meteorological data from 36 major cities in China from 2011 to 2021, including 2 m temperature (T2), relative humidity (RH), and precipitation (PRE). Both original hourly sequences and daily value sequences were used as inputs, applying two non-hierarchical clustering methods (k-means and k-medoids) and four hierarchical clustering methods (ward, complete, average, and single) for clustering. The classification results were compared using two clustering evaluation indices: the silhouette coefficient and the Calinski–Harabasz index. Additionally, the clustering was compared with the Köppen–Geiger climate classification based on the maximum difference in intra-cluster variables. The results showed that the clustering method outperformed the Köppen–Geiger climate classification, with the k-medoids method achieving the best results. Our research also compared the effectiveness of climate classification using two variables (T2 and PRE) versus three variables, including the addition of hourly RH. Cluster evaluation confirmed that incorporating the original sequence of hourly T2, PRE, and RH yielded the best performance in climate classification. This suggests that considering more meteorological variables and using hourly observation data can significantly improve the accuracy and reliability of climate classification. In addition, by setting the class numbers to two, the clustering methods effectively identified climate boundaries between northern and southern China, aligning with China’s traditional geographical division along the Qinling–Huaihe River line. |
