'Let’s Chat!' Improving Emergency Department Staff Satisfaction with the Medication Reconciliation Process

Autor: Kurt Schwieters, Richard Voigt, Suzette McDonald, Lori Scanlan-Hanson, Breanna Norman, Erin Larson, Alexis Garcia, Bo Madsen, Maria Rudis, Fernanda Bellolio, Sara Hevesi
Jazyk: angličtina
Rok vydání: 2024
Předmět:
Zdroj: Western Journal of Emergency Medicine, Vol 25, Iss 4, Pp 624-633 (2024)
Druh dokumentu: article
ISSN: 1936-900X
1936-9018
DOI: 10.5811/westjem.18324
Popis: Introduction: Patients who stay in the emergency department (ED) for prolonged periods of time require verification of home medications, a process known as medication reconciliation. The complex nature of medication reconciliation can lead to adverse events and staff dissatisfaction. A multidisciplinary team was formed to improve accuracy, timing, and staff satisfaction with the medication reconciliation process. Methods: Between November 2021–January 2022, stakeholders were surveyed to identify gaps in the medication reconciliation process. This project implemented education on role-specific tasks, as well as a “Let’s chat!” huddle, bringing together the entire care team to perform medication reconciliation. We used real-time evaluations by frontline staff to evaluate effectiveness during plan- do-study-act cycles and obtain feedback. Following the implementation period, stakeholders completed the post-intervention survey between June-July 2022, using a 4-point Likert scale (0 = very dissatisfied to 3 = very satisfied). We calculated the change in staff satisfaction from pre-intervention to post-intervention. Differences in proportions and 95% confidence intervals are reported. This study adhered to the Standards for Quality Improvement Reporting Excellence (SQUIRE 2.0) and followed the Lean Six Sigma rapid cycle process improvement (define-measure-analyze-improve-control). Results: A total of 111 front-line ED staff (physicians, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, pharmacists, nurses) completed the pre-intervention survey (of 350 ED staff, corresponding to a 31.7% response rate), and 89 stakeholders completed the post-intervention survey (a 25.4% response rate). Subjective feedback from staff identifying causes of low satisfaction with the initial process included the following: complexity of process; unclear delineation of staff roles; time burden to completion; high patient volume; and lack of standardized communication of task completion. Overall satisfaction improved after the intervention. The greatest improvement was seen in the correct medication (difference 20.7%, confidence interval [CI] 6.3–33.9%, P
Databáze: Directory of Open Access Journals