Analysis of certification requirements for the organization-developer of products of civil and state aviation
| Autor: | Анна Николаевна Маринина, Сергей Михайлович Степаненко, Виталий Григорьевич Харченко |
|---|---|
| Jazyk: | English<br />Ukrainian |
| Rok vydání: | 2021 |
| Předmět: | |
| Zdroj: | Авіаційно-космічна техніка та технологія, Vol 0, Iss 4sup2, Pp 5-10 (2021) |
| Druh dokumentu: | article |
| ISSN: | 1727-7337 2663-2217 |
| DOI: | 10.32620/aktt.2021.4sup2.01 |
| Popis: | Certification of developers, manufacturers and aviation equipment for civil aviation is carried out by the State Aviation Administration of Ukraine in accordance with the requirements of the Aviation Regulations APU-21 (Part-21). Certification of developers, manufacturers and aviation equipment for state aviation is carried out by the Department for Regulation of State Aviation of Ukraine in accordance with the requirements of the certification rules of Part-21B. Part-21B certification rules use the principles of EASA Part-21, EU Commission Regulation N 748/2012, as well as the European Military Airworthiness Requirements EMAR 21, approved by the Military Airworthiness Forum under the auspices of the European Defense Agency. The article presents the results of a comparative analysis of certification requirements for state aviation in accordance with Part-21B and for civil aviation in accordance with APU-21 (Part-21). Such an analysis makes it possible to identify differences that must be taken into account in quality management procedures in order for the enterprise to obtain developer, manufacturer and type certificates for both civil aviation equipment and state aviation equipment. The degree of coincidence of the requirements in Part-21B and in APU-21 (Part-21) is classified as follows: identical, overlapping, conflicting, completely different, the absence in one of the rules. When registering the analysis results, a graphical form was selected for visualizing numerical information in the form of a "Radar" diagram. It was concluded that the results of comparing the requirements in the field of obtaining a certificate of the development organization in accordance with Chapter J, type certification in accordance with Chapter B, approval of changes in the design of aviation equipment in accordance with Chapter D show that the requirements of the certification rules of Part-21B and the Aviation rules of the APU- 21 (Part-21) for the most part do not contradict each other and have few differences. This allows the enterprise to have a limited amount of differing evidentiary documentation to meet the certification needs of a developer, manufacturer and aircraft for civil and state aviation. |
| Databáze: | Directory of Open Access Journals |
| Externí odkaz: |
|