| Autor: |
Humaid Ghori, BSc, Rahul Bagga, MBBS, BSc (Hons), Anand Tathgar, MSc, Andrew Stone, MBBS, BSc (Hons), FRCS (Tr & Orth), Richard J. Murphy, MBChB, MA, DPhil, FRCS(Tr & Orth), Joideep Phadnis, MBChB, FRCS (Tr & Orth) |
| Jazyk: |
angličtina |
| Rok vydání: |
2024 |
| Předmět: |
|
| Zdroj: |
JSES International, Vol 8, Iss 2, Pp 371-377 (2024) |
| Druh dokumentu: |
article |
| ISSN: |
2666-6383 |
| DOI: |
10.1016/j.jseint.2023.11.008 |
| Popis: |
Background: Proximal ulna fracture-dislocations are challenging injuries with a myriad of existing classification systems. The Coronoid, proximal Ulna, Radius, and Ligaments classification (CURL) is a simple framework designed to focus attention on the key components affecting outcome and guide surgical management. This study evaluates interobserver and intraobserver reliability of this new classification. Methods: Four observers independently reviewed plain radiographs and computed tomography (CT) scans of patients with proximal ulna fracture-dislocations. Each observer scored the Coronoid (C), proximal Ulna (U), and Radius (R) components for each fracture on 2 occasions. The osseous components were subclassified as ‘intact’, ‘simple’, or ‘complex’. The Ligament component (L) was not rated as this requires intraoperative classification. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability was calculated using Cohen’s weighted kappa coefficients. X-ray and CT were compared for patients with both imaging modalities. The Landis and Koch criteria were used to interpret the strength of the kappa statistics. Results: One hundred seventy seven patients had plain X-rays; 58 patients had both X-ray and CT scans. Overall, in the X-ray only cohort, there was ‘almost perfect’ interobserver reliability for the radial head (k = 0.94) and coronoid (k = 0.83), and ‘substantial’ reliability (k = 0.68) for the proximal ulna. For the X-ray and CT cohort, interobserver reliability was ‘almost perfect’ across both modalities for the radial head (k = 0.88 and k = 0.93, respectively) and ‘moderate’ for the proximal ulna (k = 0.48 and k = 0.52, respectively). For the coronoid, interobserver reliability for X-ray interpretation was ‘substantial’ (k = 0.74) and for CT was ‘almost perfect’ (k = 0.89). Intraobserver reliability was ‘almost perfect’ for all components, other than CT assessment of the proximal ulna which demonstrated ‘substantial’ reliability (k = 0.74). Conclusion: The Coronoid, proximal Ulna, Radius, and Ligaments classification demonstrates strong interobserver and intraobserver reliability, supporting use of the classification for proximal ulna fracture-dislocations. CT is recommended for improved characterization of any fracture with a coronoid component. |
| Databáze: |
Directory of Open Access Journals |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
