| Autor: |
Michael H. Campbell, Jill Gromer-Thomas, Katija Khan, Bidyadhar Sa, Paula M. Lashley, Damian Cohall, Christine E. Chin, Russell B. Pierre, Nkemcho Ojeh, Ambadasu Bharatha, Heather Harewood, O. Peter Adams, Md. Anwarul Azim Majumder |
| Jazyk: |
angličtina |
| Rok vydání: |
2024 |
| Předmět: |
|
| Zdroj: |
Cambridge Prisms: Global Mental Health, Vol 11 (2024) |
| Druh dokumentu: |
article |
| ISSN: |
2054-4251 |
| DOI: |
10.1017/gmh.2024.83 |
| Popis: |
Caribbean health research has overwhelmingly employed measures developed elsewhere and rarely includes evaluation of psychometric properties. Established measures are important for research and practice. Particularly, measures of stress and coping are needed. Stressors experienced by Caribbean people are multifactorial, as emerging climate threats interact with existing complex and vulnerable socioeconomic environments. In the early COVID-19 pandemic, our team developed an online survey to assess the well-being of health professions students across university campuses in four Caribbean countries. This survey included the Perceived Stress Scale, 10-item version (PSS-10) and the Brief Resilient Coping Scale (BRCS). The participants were 1,519 health professions students (1,144 females, 372 males). We evaluated the psychometric qualities of the measures, including internal consistency, concurrent validity by correlating both measures, and configural invariance using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Both scales had good internal consistency, with omega values of 0.91 for the PSS-10 and 0.81 for the BRCS. CFA suggested a two-factor structure of the PSS-10 and unidimensional structure of the BRCS. These findings support further use of these measures in Caribbean populations. However, the sampling strategy limits generalizability. Further research evaluating these and other measures in the Caribbean is desirable. |
| Databáze: |
Directory of Open Access Journals |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
