| Popis: |
Abstract Purpose To investigate the role of prognostic genes related to cisplatin resistance in ovarian cancer during disease progression. Method The gene expression profile of the NCI-60 cell line was acquired through comprehensive analysis of the GEO database accession GSE116439. We performed a thorough analysis of gene expression differences in samples from seven individuals exposed to cisplatin concentrations of 0 nM compared to seven samples exposed to 15000 nM over a 24-h period. Key genes were initially identified through LASSO regression, followed by their enrichment through differential gene function analysis (GO) and pathway enrichment analysis (KEGG). Subsequently, a prognostic risk model was established for these key genes. The prognostic model's performance was assessed through K-M survival curves and ROC curves. To examine the variance in immune cell infiltration between the high and low-risk groups, CIBERSORTx analysis was employed. Finally, validation of prognostic gene expression in cisplatin-resistant ovarian cancer was carried out using clinical samples, employing RT-qPCR and Western Blot techniques. Results A total of 132 differential genes were found between cisplatin resistance and control group, and 8 key prognostic genes were selected by analysis, namely VPS13B, PLGRKT, CDKAL1, TBC1D22A, TAP1, PPP3CA, CUX1 and PPP1R15A. The efficacy of the risk assessment model derived from prognostic biomarkers, as indicated by favorable performance on both Kaplan–Meier survival curves and ROC curves. Significant variations in the abundance of Macrophages M1, T cells CD4 memory resting, T cells follicular helper, and T cells gamma delta were observed between the high and low-risk groups. To further validate our findings, RT-qPCR and Western Blot analyses were employed, confirming differential expression of the identified eight key genes between the two groups. Conclusion VPS13B, TBC1D22A, PPP3CA, CUX1 and PPP1R15A were identified as poor prognostic genes of cisplatin resistance in ovarian cancer, while PLGRKT, CDKAL1 and TAP1 were identified as good prognostic genes. This offers a novel perspective for future advancements in ovarian cancer treatment, suggesting potential avenues for the development of new therapeutic targets. |
