| Autor: |
Meredith Furst, Edward Chu, Kendall Wannamaker, Brian Planchard, Lisa Pacheco, Laura Vigil, Tarana Ahmed, Daniel Johnson, Corey Waldman |
| Jazyk: |
angličtina |
| Rok vydání: |
2020 |
| Předmět: |
|
| Zdroj: |
Journal of Academic Ophthalmology, Vol 12, Iss 02, Pp e273-e276 (2020) |
| Druh dokumentu: |
article |
| ISSN: |
2475-4757 |
| DOI: |
10.1055/s-0040-1721066 |
| Popis: |
Objective The aim of the study is to determine the effects of scribes on efficiency in an academic ophthalmology practice. Design This is a quality improvement study conducted by two ophthalmologists at an academic ophthalmology practice at UT Health San Antonio from January 2018 to April 2018. Implementation of scribes in practice was the primary intervention. Session time, patient encounter time, and template time adherence were recorded pre- and post-intervention. A second retrospective arm of the study at the same institution was performed to evaluate long-term effects of scribes on efficiency in ophthalmology practice on session times and patient volume 12 to 18 months after intervention. Main Outcome Measures Primary study outcomes and measures were the effect of scribes in academic ophthalmology practice on physician efficiency in terms of clinic session time, individual encounter time, and amount of patients seen per session, in addition to time adherence based on type of patient encounter. Results Eighty-three patients and 17 half-day clinic sessions and 169 patients and 21 half-day clinic sessions were included in the preintervention and post-intervention datasets, respectively. Number of patients per session was approximately 15 and was kept similar pre- and post-intervention (p = 0.45). Mean preintervention session time was 265.0 ± 31.4 minutes, in contrast to 223.4 ± 19.9 minutes after intervention (p |
| Databáze: |
Directory of Open Access Journals |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
