| Autor: |
Simeon-Pierre Choukem, Colette Sih, Akondu Tontu Ntumsi, Christian Akem Dimala, Yannick Mboue-Djieka, Eveline D. T. Ngouadjeu, Andre-Pascal Kengne |
| Jazyk: |
angličtina |
| Rok vydání: |
2020 |
| Předmět: |
|
| Zdroj: |
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders, Vol 20, Iss 1, Pp 1-9 (2020) |
| Druh dokumentu: |
article |
| ISSN: |
1471-2261 |
| DOI: |
10.1186/s12872-020-01371-x |
| Popis: |
Abstract Background Point-of-care haemoglobin meters are attractive solutions to improve timely diagnosis of anaemia in resource-limited settings. However, concerns regarding the accuracy of these meters may affect their adoption. The accuracy of two hand-held point-of-care haemoglobin meters was evaluated against reference full blood count analyser. Methods This was a hospital-based cross-sectional study conducted at the Douala General hospital, Cameroon. Two handheld haemoglobin meters were assessed: Urit12® (URIT Medical Electronics Co.,Ltd. Guangxi, China) and MissionHb®(ACON Laboratories, Inc., San Diego, USA); against a reference standard CELL-DYN RUBY® (ABBOTT DIAGNOSTICS, Illinois, USA). The Pearson’s correlation and Bland-Altman agreement were used to assess the technical accuracy of the meters. Clinical accuracy was evaluated using total error allowable and area under the Receiver Operating Curve. Finally, their agreement with the reference in diagnosing anaemia was assessed using the kappa statistic. Results A total of 228 participants were included in the study. The mean haemoglobin values of both haemoglobin meters (MissionHb®: 11.6 ± 2.5 g/dl; Urit12®: 10.9 ± 2.7 g/dl) were significantly higher than the reference value (10.5 ± 2.5 g/dl), p |
| Databáze: |
Directory of Open Access Journals |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Full text from SpringerLink