Autor: |
Erica Hofer Labossiere, Sandra Gonzalez-Diaz, Stephanie Enns, Paul Lopez, Xuefen Yang, Biniam Kidane, Gloria Vazquez-Grande, Abu Bakar Siddik, Sam Kam-Pun Kung, Paul Sandstrom, Amir Ravandi, T. Blake Ball, Ruey-Chyi Su |
Jazyk: |
angličtina |
Rok vydání: |
2024 |
Předmět: |
|
Zdroj: |
Scientific Reports, Vol 14, Iss 1, Pp 1-11 (2024) |
Druh dokumentu: |
article |
ISSN: |
2045-2322 |
DOI: |
10.1038/s41598-024-74739-0 |
Popis: |
Abstract Clinical samples are routinely inactivated before molecular assays to prevent pathogen transmission. Antibody-based assays are sensitive to changes in analyte conformation, but the impact of inactivation on the analyte detectability has been overlooked. This study assessed the effects of commonly used inactivation-methods, Triton X-100 (0.5%) and heat (60 °C, 1 h), on cytokine/chemokine detection in plasma, lung aspirates, and nasopharyngeal samples. Heat significantly reduced analyte detectability in plasma (IL-12p40, IL-15, IL-16, VEGF, IL-7, TNF-β) by 33–99% (p ≤ 0.02), while Triton X-100 minimally affected analytes in plasma and nasopharyngeal samples (11–37%, p ≤ 0.04) and had no significant impact on lung aspirates. Structural analysis revealed that cytokines affected by heat had more hydrophobic residues and higher instability-indices. As the protein-detectability was affected differently in different sample types, the sample environment could also influence protein stability. This underscores the importance of selecting the most suitable inactivation methods for clinical samples to ensure accurate cytokine/chemokine analysis in both clinical and research settings. |
Databáze: |
Directory of Open Access Journals |
Externí odkaz: |
|
Nepřihlášeným uživatelům se plný text nezobrazuje |
K zobrazení výsledku je třeba se přihlásit.
|