Autor: |
Isaraporn Thepwongsa, Radhakrishnan Muthukumar, Poompong Sripa, Leon Piterman |
Jazyk: |
angličtina |
Rok vydání: |
2023 |
Předmět: |
|
Zdroj: |
Heliyon, Vol 9, Iss 2, Pp e13355- (2023) |
Druh dokumentu: |
article |
ISSN: |
2405-8440 |
DOI: |
10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13355 |
Popis: |
Background: Despite continuing medical education (CME) programmes on evidence-based diabetes care, evidence-based best practice and actual GP practice remain scant. Online CME offers numerous benefits to general practitioners (GPs), particularly during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. In Thailand, CME is a voluntary process and is yet to be established as a mandatory requirement. This study examined GP uptake of online diabetes CME and the changes in GPs’ attitudes to and knowledge of Type 2 diabetes management. Methods: A cross-sectional study and a before-and-after study were employed with 279 GP trainees who voluntarily undertook a newly-developed online diabetes programme. A follow-up survey was conducted six months after the GP trainees completed their training. Results: One hundred and twelve out of 279 GP trainees (40.1%) participated in the study, of whom 37 (13.3%) enrolled in the online diabetes programme, and 20 (7.2%) completed the programme. Before enrolling in the programme, the participants' mean diabetes knowledge score was 61.5%. The participants’ confidence in effective insulin treatment increased significantly after the programme (95% Confidence interval [CI], −0.51-0.00; P = 0.05), but their knowledge scores before and after the programme were not statistically different (95% CI, −3.93-0.59; P = 0.14). Conclusion: Uptake of the online diabetes CME was poor, although appropriate recruitment strategies were employed, and the online educational option was attractive and accessible during the COVID-19 pandemic. This study emphasises the gap between evidence-based practice and actual GP practice and the need for mandatory CME. |
Databáze: |
Directory of Open Access Journals |
Externí odkaz: |
|