| Autor: |
Peter F. Cronholm, Janelle Applequist, Jeffrey Krischer, Ebony Fontenot, Trocon Davis, Cristina Burroughs, Carol A. McAlear, Renée Borchin, Joyce Kullman, Simon Carette, Nader Khalidi, Curry Koening, Carol A. Langford, Paul Monach, Larry Moreland, Christian Pagnoux, Ulrich Specks, Antoine G. Sreih, Steven R. Ytterberg, Peter A. Merkel, Vasculitis Clinical Research Consortium |
| Jazyk: |
angličtina |
| Rok vydání: |
2024 |
| Předmět: |
|
| Zdroj: |
BMC Medical Research Methodology, Vol 24, Iss 1, Pp 1-14 (2024) |
| Druh dokumentu: |
article |
| ISSN: |
1471-2288 |
| DOI: |
10.1186/s12874-024-02352-w |
| Popis: |
Abstract Background Traditional medical research infrastructures relying on the Centers of Excellence (CoE) model (an infrastructure or shared facility providing high standards of research excellence and resources to advance scientific knowledge) are often limited by geographic reach regarding patient accessibility, presenting challenges for study recruitment and accrual. Thus, the development of novel, patient-centered (PC) strategies (e.g., the use of online technologies) to support recruitment and streamline study procedures are necessary. This research focused on an implementation evaluation of a design innovation with implementation outcomes as communicated by study staff and patients for CoE and PC approaches for a randomized controlled trial (RCT) for patients with vasculitis. Methods In-depth qualitative interviews were conducted with 32 individuals (17 study team members, 15 patients). Transcripts were coded using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). Results The following CFIR elements emerged: characteristics of the intervention, inner setting, characteristics of individuals, and process. From the staff perspective, the communication of the PC approach was a major challenge, but should have been used as an opportunity to identify one “point person” in charge of all communicative elements among the study team. Study staff from both arms were highly supportive of the PC approach and saw its promise, particularly regarding online consent procedures. Patients reported high self-efficacy in reference to the PC approach and utilization of online technologies. Local physicians were integral for making patients feel comfortable about participation in research studies. Conclusions The complexity of replicating the interpersonal nature of the CoE model in the virtual setting is substantial, meaning the PC approach should be viewed as a hybrid strategy that integrates online and face-to-face practices. Trial registrations 1) Name: The Assessment of Prednisone In Remission Trial – Centers of Excellence Approach (TAPIR). Trial registration number: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01940094 . Date of registration: September 10, 2013. 2) Name: The Assessment of Prednisone In Remission Trial – Patient Centric Approach (TAPIR). Trial registration number: Clinical Trials.gov NCT01933724 . Date of registration: September 2, 2013. |
| Databáze: |
Directory of Open Access Journals |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
|
Nepřihlášeným uživatelům se plný text nezobrazuje |
K zobrazení výsledku je třeba se přihlásit.
|
