Autor: |
Ledogar Robert J, Omer Khalid, Losos Joe, Ansari Noor, Cockcroft Anne, Andersson Neil, Tugwell Peter, Shea Beverley |
Jazyk: |
angličtina |
Rok vydání: |
2005 |
Předmět: |
|
Zdroj: |
BMC Public Health, Vol 5, Iss 1, p 72 (2005) |
Druh dokumentu: |
article |
ISSN: |
1471-2458 |
DOI: |
10.1186/1471-2458-5-72 |
Popis: |
Abstract Background Household decision-makers decide about service use based largely on the costs and perceived benefits of health interventions. Very often this leads to different decisions than those imagined by health planners, resulting in under-utilisation of public services like immunisation. In the case of Lasbela district in the south of Pakistan, only one in every ten children is immunised despite free immunisation offers by government health services. Methods/design In 32 communities representative of Lasbela district, 3344 households participated in a baseline survey on early child health. In the 18 randomly selected intervention communities, we will stimulate discussions on the household cost-benefit equation, as measured in the baseline. The reference (control) communities will also participate in the three annual follow-up surveys, feedback of the general survey results and the usual health promotion activities relating to immunisation, but without focussed discussion on the household cost-benefit equations. Discussion This project proposes knowledge translation as a two-way communication that can be augmented by local and international evidence. We will document cultural and contextual barriers to immunisation in the context of household cost-benefit equations. The project makes this information accessible to health managers, and reciprocally, makes information on immunisation effects and side effects available to communities. We will measure the impact of this two-way knowledge translation on immunisation uptake. |
Databáze: |
Directory of Open Access Journals |
Externí odkaz: |
|