| Autor: |
Raphaëlle Dantigny, Fiona Ecarnot, Guillaume Economos, Elise Perceau‐Chambard, Stéphane Sanchez, Cécile Barbaret |
| Jazyk: |
angličtina |
| Rok vydání: |
2022 |
| Předmět: |
|
| Zdroj: |
Cancer Medicine, Vol 11, Iss 3, Pp 826-837 (2022) |
| Druh dokumentu: |
article |
| ISSN: |
2045-7634 |
| DOI: |
10.1002/cam4.4467 |
| Popis: |
Abstract Background Prognostic scales exist to estimate patient survival in advanced cancer. However, there are no studies evaluating their use and practice. The objective of this study was to evaluate in a nationwide study the proportion of oncologists and palliative care physicians who had knowledge of these scales. Methods A descriptive, national, cross‐sectional study was conducted via an online questionnaire to oncologists and palliative care physicians across France. Results Palliative care physicians had better knowledge of the scales than oncologists (42.3% (n = 74) vs. 27.8% (n = 33), p = 0.015). The Palliative Performance Status (PPS) and Pronopall Scale were the best‐known (51.4% (n = 55) and 65.4% (n = 70), respectively) and the most widely used (35% (n = 28) and 60% (n = 48), respectively). Improved training in the use of these scales was requested by 85.4% (n = 251) of participants, while 72.8% (n = 214) reported that they did not use them at all. Limited training and lack of consensus on which scale to use were cited as the main obstacles to use. Conclusion This is the first national study on the use of prognostic scales in advanced cancer. Our findings highlight a need to improve training in these scales and to reach a consensus on scale selection. |
| Databáze: |
Directory of Open Access Journals |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
|
Nepřihlášeným uživatelům se plný text nezobrazuje |
K zobrazení výsledku je třeba se přihlásit.
|
