Perioperative regional anaesthesia in kidney transplantation

Autor: V. Kh. Sharipova, F. Kh. Siyabaev, A. Kh. Alimov, M. M. Sadikov
Jazyk: English<br />Russian
Rok vydání: 2024
Předmět:
Zdroj: Трансплантология (Москва), Vol 16, Iss 1, Pp 34-42 (2024)
Druh dokumentu: article
ISSN: 2074-0506
2542-0909
DOI: 10.23873/2074-0506-2024-16-1-34-42
Popis: Background. Postoperative analgesia in kidney transplant recipients is challenging due to potential nephrotoxicity of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and the reduced clearance of opioid metabolites during transient renal impairment. Opioid-sparing multimodal postoperative analgesia using regional analgesia methods could provide better pain control and early activation after kidney transplantation.Aim. To evaluate the clinical results of treatment using regional pain management methods in kidney transplant recipients.Material and methods. A single-center study was conducted at Republican Research Center of Emergency Medicine from 2020 to 2022. The study included 97 patients who underwent heterotopic kidney transplantation from a living related donor. Patients were divided into 3 groups. In group 1 (31 patients), general anesthesia was used. For postoperative analgesia opioid analgesics in combination with metamizole 1000 mg were used. In group 2 (33 recipient patients), a combination of general anesthesia and open transversus abdominis plane block was used. In group 3 (33 recipient patients), a combination of general anesthesia and erector spine plane block was performed. Opioid analgesics were used as a "rescue analgesia" when necessary. The primary study end points were the pain intensity assessed by a visual analogue scale and opioid consumption on the first day after surgery. Secondary endpoints were the time of intestinal motility recovery, the presence of nausea and vomiting, the Intensive Care Unit length of stay and the hospital length of stay.Results. Pain intensity 6 hours after surgery in patients of group 1 was 13.5% and 24.6% higher than in patients of group 2 and 3, respectively. In group 2, pain intensity was 12.8% higher compared to group 3 (p=0.0017). At 12 hours after surgery, the pain intensity was 42% higher in group 1 compared to group 2 and group 3 (p
Databáze: Directory of Open Access Journals