Efficacy of azilsartan on left ventricular diastolic dysfunction compared with candesartan: J-TASTE randomized controlled trial

Autor: Shin Ito, Hiroyuki Takahama, Masanori Asakura, Yukio Abe, Masayoshi Ajioka, Toshihisa Anzai, Takuo Arikawa, Takaharu Hayashi, Yorihiko Higashino, Shinya Hiramitsu, Noriaki Iwahashi, Chisato Izumi, Kazuo Kimura, Koichiro Kinugawa, Hidetaka Kioka, Young-Jae Lim, Ken Matsuoka, Satoshi Matsuoka, Hirohiko Motoki, Sunao Nakamura, Takafumi Nakayama, Akihiro Nomura, Taishi Sasaoka, Shin Takiuchi, Shigeru Toyoda, Tomoya Ueda, Tetsuya Watanabe, Akira Yamada, Masayoshi Yamamoto, Takashi Sozu, Masafumi Kitakaze
Jazyk: angličtina
Rok vydání: 2023
Předmět:
Zdroj: Scientific Reports, Vol 13, Iss 1, Pp 1-12 (2023)
Druh dokumentu: article
ISSN: 2045-2322
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-39779-y
Popis: Abstract Characterized by ventricular and vascular stiffness, heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) has led to high morbidity and mortality. As azilsartan is an angiotensin receptor blocker with the highest myocardial and vascular affinities, azilsartan may improve the left ventricular (LV) diastolic function in patients with hypertension and either HFpEF or HF with mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF) more than candesartan. In this randomized, open-label trial, we randomly assigned 193 hypertensive patients with HF and LV ejection fraction ≥ 45% to 20 mg of azilsartan (n = 95) or 8 mg of candesartan (n = 98), once daily for 48 weeks. After the initiation of treatment, changes in the doses of the study drugs were permitted based on the patient’s conditions, including blood pressure (median dose at 48 weeks: azilsartan 20.0 mg/day, candesartan 8.0 mg/day). The primary endpoint was the baseline-adjusted change in the ratio of peak early diastolic transmitral flow velocity (E) to early diastolic mitral annular velocity (e′) (E/e′). Adjusted least-squares mean (LSM) change in E/e′ was − 0.8 (95% confidence interval [CI] − 1.49 to − 0.04) in the azilsartan group and 0.2 (95% CI − 0.49 to 0.94) in the candesartan group, providing the LSM differences of − 1.0 (95% CI − 2.01 to 0.03, P = 0.057). The median change in left atrial volume index was – 2.7 mL/m2 with azilsartan vs 1.4 mL/m2 with candesartan (P = 0.091). The frequency of adverse events related to hypotension and hyperkalemia did not differ between the groups. The current study did not provide strong evidence that azilsartan improves LV diastolic dysfunction, and further confirmatory study is required.
Databáze: Directory of Open Access Journals
Nepřihlášeným uživatelům se plný text nezobrazuje