Autor: |
Yiyin Cao, Haofei Li, Ling Jie Cheng, Madeleine T. King, Georg Kemmler, David Cella, Hongjuan Yu, Weidong Huang, Nan Luo |
Jazyk: |
angličtina |
Rok vydání: |
2024 |
Předmět: |
|
Zdroj: |
Health Economics Review, Vol 14, Iss 1, Pp 1-10 (2024) |
Druh dokumentu: |
article |
ISSN: |
2191-1991 |
DOI: |
10.1186/s13561-024-00560-0 |
Popis: |
Abstract Objective To perform a comparison of the measurement properties of two cancer-specific Multi-Attribute Utility Instruments (MAUIs), EORTC QLU-C10D and FACT-8D, in Chinese patients with hematologic malignancies (HM). Methods We conducted a longitudinal study on patients with HM in China, using QLU-C10D and FACT-8D at baseline and follow-up (3–4 months from baseline). We assessed: (i) convergent validity using Spearman’s rank correlation test (r) with EQ-5D-5L; (ii) clinical-groups validity by differentiating cancer stages, overall health assessment (OHA), Eastern Cancer Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status, and mental health status. We also examined clinical validity with effect size (ES) and relative efficiency (RE); (iii) responsiveness to changes in patient self-perception using receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves and area under the curves (AUC); and (iv) agreement using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and visualized with Bland-Altman plot. Results Among the 308 patients with HM at baseline, 131 completed the follow-up survey. Agreement between the two measures was high (ICC = 0.76). Both measures were highly correlated with EQ-5D-5 L and significantly differentiated (p |
Databáze: |
Directory of Open Access Journals |
Externí odkaz: |
|