Assessment of Entrustable Professional Activities Among Dutch Endocrine Supervisors

Autor: Joanne M. de Laat, Anouk N.A. van der Horst-Schrivers, Natasha M. Appelman-Dijkstra, Peter H. Bisschop, Koen M.A. Dreijerink, Madeleine L. Drent, Melanie M. van de Klauw, Wendela L. de Ranitz, Aline M.E. Stades, Nike M.M.L. Stikkelbroeck, Henri J.L.M. Timmers, Olle ten Cate
Jazyk: angličtina
Rok vydání: 2024
Předmět:
Zdroj: Journal of CME, Vol 13, Iss 1 (2024)
Druh dokumentu: article
ISSN: 28338073
2833-8073
DOI: 10.1080/28338073.2024.2360137
Popis: Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs) are an important tool to support individualisation of medical training in a competency-based setting and are increasingly implemented in the clinical speciality training for endocrinologist. This study aims to assess interrater agreement and factors that potentially impact EPA scores. Five known factors that affect entrustment decisions in health profesions training (capability, integrity, reliability, humility, agency) were used in this study. A case-vignette study using standardised written cases. Case vignettes (n = 6) on the topics thyroid disease, pituitary disease, adrenal disease, calcium and bone disorders, diabetes mellitus, and gonadal disorders were written by two endocrinologists and a medical education expert and assessed by endocrinologists experienced in the supervision of residents in training. Primary outcome is the inter-rater agreement of entrustment decisions for endocrine EPAs among raters. Secondary outcomes included the dichotomous interrater agreement (entrusted vs. non-entrusted), and an exploration of factors that impact decision-making. The study protocol was registered and approved by the Ethical Review Board of the Netherlands Association for Medical Education (NVMO-ERB # 2020.2.5). Nine endocrinologists from six different academic regions participated. Overall, the Fleiss Kappa measure of agreement for the EPA level was 0.11 (95% CI: 0.03–0.22) and for the entrustment decision 0.24 (95% CI 0.11–0.37). Of the five features that impacted the entrustment decision, capability was ranked as the most important by a majority of raters (56%–67%) in every case. There is a considerable discrepancy between the EPA levels assigned by different raters. These findings emphasise the need to base entrustment decisions on multiple observations, made by a team of supervisors and enriched with factors other than direct medical competence.
Databáze: Directory of Open Access Journals
Externí odkaz:
Nepřihlášeným uživatelům se plný text nezobrazuje