Autor: |
Paige Terrien Church, Maya Dahan, Amy Rule, Annie Janvier, Jane E. Stewart, John S. Maypole, Darcy Fehlings, Jonathan S. Litt, Rudaina Banihani |
Jazyk: |
angličtina |
Rok vydání: |
2024 |
Předmět: |
|
Zdroj: |
Children, Vol 11, Iss 2, p 242 (2024) |
Druh dokumentu: |
article |
ISSN: |
2227-9067 |
DOI: |
10.3390/children11020242 |
Popis: |
The Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) has a language and culture that is its own. For professionals, it is a place of intense and constant attention to microdetails and cautious optimism. For parents, it is a foreign place with a new and unique language and culture. It is also the setting in which they are introduced to their child and parenthood for this child. This combination has been referred to as an emotional cauldron. The neonatal ethics literature mainly examines complex ethical dilemmas about withholding/drawing life sustaining interventions for fragile children. Rarely are everyday ethics or mundane ethics discussed. Microethics describe the mundane, discrete moments that occur between patients/families and clinicians. A key piece of these microethics is the language used to discuss patient care. Perception of prognoses, particularly around long-term neurodevelopmental outcome, is shaped with the language used. Despite this, clinicians in the NICU often have no specific training in the long-term neurodevelopment outcomes that they discuss. This paper focuses on the microethics of language used to discuss long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes, the developmental neuroscience behind language processing, and offers recommendations for more accurate and improved communication around long-term outcomes with families with critically ill neonates. |
Databáze: |
Directory of Open Access Journals |
Externí odkaz: |
|