| Popis: |
Heavy metal pollution, including that caused by cadmium (Cd), is a matter of increasing concern. Although in situ passivation remediation has been widely used to treat heavy metal-polluted soils, most studies have focused on acidic soils, while studies on alkaline soil conditions are scarce. In this study, the effects of biochar (BC), phosphate rock powder (PRP), and humic acid (HA) on Cd2+ adsorption were examined alone and in combination to choose an appropriate Cd passivation approach for weakly alkaline soils. Additionally, the combined impact of passivation on Cd availability, plant Cd absorption, plant physiology indexes, and soil microbial community was elucidated. BC had a higher Cd adsorption capacity and removal rate than those of PRP and HA. Moreover, HA and PRP enhanced the adsorption capacity of BC. A combination of biochar and humic acid (BHA), and biochar and phosphate rock powder (BPRP) significantly affected soil Cd passivation. BHA and BPRP decreased the plant Cd content and soil Cd-DTPA (diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid) by 31.36 %, 20.80 %, 38.19 %, and 41.26 %, respectively; however, they increased the fresh weight by 65.64–71.48 % respectively, and dry weight by 62.41–71.35 %, respectively. Notably, only BPRP increased the node and root tip number in wheat. Total protein (TP) content increased in BHA and BPRP, with BHA showing lower TP than BPRP. BHA and BPRP showed a reduction in glutathione (GSH), malondialdehyde (MDA), H2O2, and peroxidase (POD); BHA showed a significantly lower GSH than BPRP. Additionally, BHA and BPRP increased soil sucrase, alkaline phosphatase, and urease activities, with BPRP showing considerably higher enzyme activity than BHA. Both BHA and BPRP increased the number of soil bacteria, altered the community composition, and critical metabolic pathways. The results demonstrated that BPRP could be used as a highly effective, novel passivation technique for the remediation of Cd-contaminated soil. |
Full Text from ScienceDirect