Does the 2017 global initiative for chronic obstructive lung disease revision really improve the assessment of Chinese chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients? A multicenter prospective study for more than 5 years
Autor: | Yanan Cui, Yiming Ma, Zhongshang Dai, Yingjiao Long, Yan Chen, Xiangxiang Pan, Peifang Wei |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Rok vydání: | 2023 |
Předmět: | |
Zdroj: | Chinese Medical Journal, Vol 136, Iss 21, Pp 2587-2595 (2023) |
Druh dokumentu: | article |
ISSN: | 0366-6999 2542-5641 00000000 |
DOI: | 10.1097/CM9.0000000000002487 |
Popis: | Abstract. Background:. The Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) 2017 proposed a new classification that reclassified many chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients from group D to B. However, there is a paucity of data related to the comparison between reclassified and non-reclassified COPD patients in terms of long-term prognosis. This study aimed to investigate long-term outcomes of them and determine whether the GOLD 2017 revision improved the assessment of COPD patients. Methods:. This observational, multicenter, prospective study recruited outpatients at 12 tertiary hospitals in China from November 2016 to February 2018 and followed them up until February 2022. All enrolled patients were classified into groups A to D based on GOLD 2017, and the subjects in group B included patients reclassified from group D to B (group DB) and those remaining in group B (group BB). Incidence rates and hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated for the exacerbation of COPD and hospitalization in each group. Results:. We included and followed up 845 patients. During the first year of follow-up, the GOLD 2017 classification had a better discrimination ability for different risks of COPD exacerbation and hospitalization than GOLD 2013. Group DB was associated with a higher risk of moderate-to-severe exacerbation (HR = 1.88, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.37–2.59, P |
Databáze: | Directory of Open Access Journals |
Externí odkaz: |