| Popis: |
Magdolna Barra,1 Edit Remák,1 Dong Dong Liu,2 Li Xie,2 Lucy Abraham,3 Alesia B Sadosky4 1Evidera, Budapest, Hungary; 2Health Economics & Outcomes Research, Pfizer Investment Co., Ltd., Beijing, China; 3Health Economics & Outcomes Research, Pfizer Ltd, Tadworth, UK; 4Health Economics & Outcomes Research, Pfizer Inc, New York, NY, USA Purpose: The use of parecoxib plus opioids for postoperative analgesia in noncardiac surgical patients seems to be cost-saving in Europe due to a reduction in opioid use and opioid-related adverse events. Given the lack of information on postoperative analgesic use in Asia, this study assessed the economic consequences of the addition of parecoxib to opioids vs opioids alone to treat postsurgical pain in China.Methods: A cost-consequence economic evaluation assessed direct medical costs related to opioid-related clinically meaningful events (CMEs) utilizing dosing information and reported frequency of events from a Phase III, randomized, double-blind, global clinical trial (PARA-0505-069) of parecoxib plus opioids vs opioids alone for 3 days following major orthopedic, abdominal, gynecologic, or noncardiac thoracic surgery requiring general or regional anesthesia. The cost of CMEs was calculated using information on resource utilization and unit costs provided by a panel of clinical experts in China. Sensitivity analyses were performed to test the robustness of the results.Results: Patients treated with parecoxib plus opioids reported fewer CMEs (mean 0.62 vs 1.04 events per patient [P |
