| Autor: |
Švab Igor, Klemenc-Ketiš Zalika, Zupanič Saša |
| Jazyk: |
angličtina |
| Rok vydání: |
2023 |
| Předmět: |
|
| Zdroj: |
Slovenian Journal of Public Health, Vol 62, Iss 3, Pp 109-112 (2023) |
| Druh dokumentu: |
article |
| ISSN: |
1854-2476 |
| DOI: |
10.2478/sjph-2023-0015 |
| Popis: |
The COVID-19 pandemic has led to a surge in scientific publications, some of which have bypassed the usual peer-review processes, leading to an increase in unsupported claims being referenced. Therefore, the need for references in scientific articles is increasingly being questioned. The practice of relying solely on quantitative measures, such as impact factor, is also considered inadequate by many experts. This can lead to researchers choosing research ideas that are likely to generate favourable metrics instead of interesting and important topics. Evaluating the quality and scientific value of articles requires a rethinking of current approaches, with a move away from purely quantitative methods. |
| Databáze: |
Directory of Open Access Journals |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
