Effect of a comprehensive eRehabilitation intervention alongside conventional stroke rehabilitation on disability and health-related quality of life: A pre–post comparison
| Autor: | Berber Brouns, Leti van Bodegom-Vos, Arend J. de Kloet, Sietske J. Tamminga, Gerard Volker, Monique A.M. Berger, Marta Fiocco, Paulien H. Goossens, Thea P.M Vlieland, Jorit J.L. Meesters |
|---|---|
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Rok vydání: | 2021 |
| Předmět: | |
| Zdroj: | Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, Vol 53, Iss 3, p jrm00161 (2021) |
| Druh dokumentu: | article |
| ISSN: | 1650-1977 1651-2081 16501977 |
| DOI: | 10.2340/16501977-2785 |
| Popis: | Objective: To compare the effect on disability and quality of life, of conventional rehabilitation (control group) with individualized, tailored eRehabilitation intervention alongside conventional rehabilitation (Fast@home; intervention group), for people with stroke. Methods: Pre–post design. The intervention comprised cognitive (Braingymmer®) and physical (Telerevalidatie®/Physitrack®) exercises, activity-tracking (Activ8®) and psycho-education. Assessments were made at admission (T0) and after 3 (T3) and 6 months (T6). The primary outcome concerned disability (Stroke Impact Scale; SIS). Secondary outcomes were: health-related quality of life, fatigue, self-management, participation and physical activity. Changes in scores between T0–T3, T3–T6, and T0–T6 were compared by analysis of variance and linear mixed models. Results: The study included 153 and 165 people with stroke in the control and intervention groups, respectively. In the intervention group, 82 (50%) people received the intervention, of whom 54 (66%) used it. Between T3 and T6, the change in scores for the SIS subscales Communication (control group/intervention group –1.7/–0.3) and Physical strength (–5.7/3.3) were significantly greater in the total intervention group (all mean differences |
| Databáze: | Directory of Open Access Journals |
| Externí odkaz: |
|