Robotic-assisted vs conventional surgery in medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a clinical and radiological study

Autor: Roberto Negrín, Jaime Duboy, Magaly Iñiguez, Nicolás O. Reyes, Maximiliano Barahona, Gonzalo Ferrer, Carlos Infante, Nicolás Jabes
Jazyk: angličtina
Rok vydání: 2021
Předmět:
Zdroj: Knee Surgery & Related Research, Vol 33, Iss 1, Pp 1-7 (2021)
Druh dokumentu: article
ISSN: 2234-2451
DOI: 10.1186/s43019-021-00087-2
Popis: Abstract Background The use of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) has increased and new technologies have been developed to improve patient survival and satisfaction, soft tissue balance, alignment, and component size. Robot-assisted systems offer an increase in surgical precision and accuracy. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the precision of component position using five radiological parameters in conventional and robotic-assisted medial UKA using the NAVIO system. Methods A cohort study was designed for patients who underwent medial UKA between April 2017 and March 2019 in a single center. Patients were allocated in the conventional (UKA-C) or robotic-assisted (UKA-R) group. The variables analyzed were age, gender, affected knee side, length of hospital stay, surgical time, and radiological measurements such as anatomical medial distal femoral angle (aMDFA), anatomical medial proximal tibial angle (aMPTA), tibial slope, the sagittal femoral angle, and the component size. A target was defined for each measurement, and a successful UKA was defined if at least four radiological measures were on target after surgery. Also, patients’ reported outcomes were evaluated using the Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and a numeric rating scale (NRS) for pain. Results Thirty-four patients were included, 18 of them underwent UKA-R. The success rate for UKA in the UKA-R group was 87%; meanwhile, in the UKA-C group this was 28%, this difference was significant and powered (Fisher’s exact test, p = 0.001; 1 − β = 0.95). Also, a 5-point difference in favor of the UKA-R group in the median OKS (p = 0.01), and a significantly lower median NRS for pain (p
Databáze: Directory of Open Access Journals
Nepřihlášeným uživatelům se plný text nezobrazuje