Apical block versus basolateral prostatic plexus block in transrectal ultrasound guided prostatic biopsy: A prospective randomized study
| Autor: | N Khurana, P Lavania, R Goyal, S Agrawal, D Dubey, A Mandhani, A Srivastava, R Kapoor, A Kumar |
|---|---|
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Rok vydání: | 2006 |
| Předmět: | |
| Zdroj: | Indian Journal of Urology, Vol 22, Iss 2, Pp 118-121 (2006) |
| Druh dokumentu: | article |
| ISSN: | 0970-1591 1998-3824 |
| DOI: | 10.4103/0970-1591.26564 |
| Popis: | OBJECTIVES: We prospectively analyzed the efficacy and safety of apical block, bilateral (B/L) basolateral prostatic plexus block and unilateral (U/L) basolateral prostatic plexus block in patients undergoing transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)- guided prostatic biopsies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From July 2003 to July 2004, 60 patients of median age 63 yrs and median PSA of15.8 ng/ml, underwent TRUS- guided prostatic biopsies. These biopsies were performed in the left lateral position, after cleansing enema and single dose of antibiotic. Patients were randomized into 3 groups. Under TRUS guidance, group1 (n=20) received 10 ml of 1% lignocaine at the apical area of the prostate, group 2 (n=20) received 5 ml of 1% lignocaine in the basolateral prostatic plexus bilaterally and group 3 (n=20) received 10 ml of 1% lignocaine at basolateral prostatic plexus unilaterally, using an 18 F needle. Five minutes after the injection, a series of 10 prostatic biopsies were performed. Pain during biopsy was assessed using visual analogue pain score. RESULTS: Patients with apical prostatic block had significantly lower pain scores (1.5 ± 0.9) than those with B/L (2.6 ±1.2) and U/L basolateral prostatic plexus block (2.8 ± 1.4). The three groups were similar in regard to age, prostatic volume and number of cores. CONCLUSIONS: Apical prostatic plexus block was the most effective technique and could be a useful alternative to basolateral prostatic plexus block. |
| Databáze: | Directory of Open Access Journals |
| Externí odkaz: |
|