Autor: |
Gyeong Deok Jo, Chulkyun Ahn, Jung Hee Hong, Da Som Kim, Jongsoo Park, Hyungjin Kim, Jong Hyo Kim, Jin Mo Goo, Ju Gang Nam |
Jazyk: |
angličtina |
Rok vydání: |
2023 |
Předmět: |
|
Zdroj: |
BMC Medical Imaging, Vol 23, Iss 1, Pp 1-10 (2023) |
Druh dokumentu: |
article |
ISSN: |
1471-2342 |
DOI: |
10.1186/s12880-023-01081-8 |
Popis: |
Abstract Objective Few studies have explored the clinical feasibility of using deep-learning reconstruction to reduce the radiation dose of CT. We aimed to compare the image quality and lung nodule detectability between chest CT using a quarter of the low dose (QLD) reconstructed with vendor-agnostic deep-learning image reconstruction (DLIR) and conventional low-dose (LD) CT reconstructed with iterative reconstruction (IR). Materials and methods We retrospectively collected 100 patients (median age, 61 years [IQR, 53–70 years]) who received LDCT using a dual-source scanner, where total radiation was split into a 1:3 ratio. QLD CT was generated using a quarter dose and reconstructed with DLIR (QLD-DLIR), while LDCT images were generated using a full dose and reconstructed with IR (LD-IR). Three thoracic radiologists reviewed subjective noise, spatial resolution, and overall image quality, and image noise was measured in five areas. The radiologists were also asked to detect all Lung-RADS category 3 or 4 nodules, and their performance was evaluated using area under the jackknife free-response receiver operating characteristic curve (AUFROC). Results The median effective dose was 0.16 (IQR, 0.14–0.18) mSv for QLD CT and 0.65 (IQR, 0.57–0.71) mSv for LDCT. The radiologists’ evaluations showed no significant differences in subjective noise (QLD-DLIR vs. LD-IR, lung-window setting; 3.23 ± 0.19 vs. 3.27 ± 0.22; P = .11), spatial resolution (3.14 ± 0.28 vs. 3.16 ± 0.27; P = .12), and overall image quality (3.14 ± 0.21 vs. 3.17 ± 0.17; P = .15). QLD-DLIR demonstrated lower measured noise than LD-IR in most areas (P |
Databáze: |
Directory of Open Access Journals |
Externí odkaz: |
|