| Autor: |
Sasan Moghimi, Hesam Hashemian, Rebecca Chen, Mohammadkarim Johari, Massood Mohammadi, Shan C. Lin |
| Jazyk: |
angličtina |
| Rok vydání: |
2015 |
| Předmět: |
|
| Zdroj: |
Journal of Current Ophthalmology, Vol 27, Iss 3, Pp 70-75 (2015) |
| Druh dokumentu: |
article |
| ISSN: |
2452-2325 |
| DOI: |
10.1016/j.joco.2015.12.001 |
| Popis: |
Purpose: To compare long term efficacy of phacoemulsification in the early management of acute primary angle closure (APAC) after aborting an acute attack and performing laser peripheral iridotomy (LPI). Methods: In this nonrandomized comparative prospective study, we included 35 subjects presenting with APAC who had responded to medical treatment and LPI with intraocular pressure (IOP) less than 25 mmHg. Twenty patients with visually significant cataract with visual acuity of 21 mmHg with or without medication, or 2) if a patient required any medication to have IOP ≤21 mmHg after 1 month. Patients were followed for at least one year. Result: IOP, number of medications, gonioscopy grading, and amount of synechiae were not significantly different at baseline between the two groups. Acute attack did not recur in any patient. There was more significant failure in the LPI Only group compared with the Phaco/LPI group (40% vs. 5%; p = 0.02). There was a significant difference in final IOP between the two study groups (13.90 ± 2.17 vs. 17.8 ± 4.16 in the Phaco/LPI and LPI Only groups, respectively; p = 0.001). Patients in the Phaco-LPI group needed less medication than the other group at final follow-up. No serious complications have arisen from the immediate LPI or phacoemulsification. Conclusion: Phacoemulsification is a safe procedure for preventing IOP rise after aborting acute primary angle closure if performed within a few weeks of the attack. |
| Databáze: |
Directory of Open Access Journals |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
