Autor: |
Chenxi Huang, Sanket S. Dhruva, Andreas C. Coppi, Frederick Warner, Shu‐Xia Li, Haiqun Lin, Khurram Nasir, Harlan M. Krumholz |
Jazyk: |
angličtina |
Rok vydání: |
2017 |
Předmět: |
|
Zdroj: |
Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease, Vol 6, Iss 11 (2017) |
Druh dokumentu: |
article |
ISSN: |
2047-9980 |
DOI: |
10.1161/JAHA.117.007509 |
Popis: |
BackgroundSPRINT (Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial) and the ACCORD (Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes) blood pressure trial used similar interventions but produced discordant results. We investigated whether differences in systolic blood pressure (SBP) response contributed to the discordant trial results. Methods and ResultsWe evaluated the distributions of SBP response during the first year for the intensive and standard treatment groups of SPRINT and ACCORD using growth mixture models. We assessed whether significant differences existed between trials in the distributions of SBP achieved at 1 year and the treatment‐independent relationships of achieved SBP with risks of primary outcomes defined in each trial, heart failure, stroke, and all‐cause death. We examined whether visit‐to‐visit variability was associated with heterogeneous treatment effects. Among the included 9027 SPRINT and 4575 ACCORD participants, the difference in mean SBP achieved between treatment groups was 15.7 mm Hg in SPRINT and 14.2 mm Hg in ACCORD, but SPRINT had significantly less between‐group overlap in the achieved SBP (standard deviations of intensive and standard groups, respectively: 6.7 and 5.9 mm Hg in SPRINT versus 8.8 and 8.2 mm Hg in ACCORD; P |
Databáze: |
Directory of Open Access Journals |
Externí odkaz: |
|