| Popis: |
Abstract Background To evaluate simplified intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) for differentiating malignant versus benign breast lesions as (i) stand-alone tool and (ii) add-on to dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Methods 1.5-T DWI data (b = 0, 50, 250, 800 s/mm2) were retrospectively analysed for 126 patients with malignant or benign breast lesions. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) ADC (0, 800) and IVIM-based parameters D 1′ = ADC (50, 800), D 2′ = ADC (250, 800), f 1′ = f (0, 50, 800), f 2′ = f (0, 250, 800) and D*′ = D* (0, 50, 250, 800) were voxel-wise calculated without fitting procedures. Regions of interest were analysed in vital tumour and perfusion hot spots. Beside the single parameters, the combined use of D 1′ with f 1′ and D 2′ with f 2′ was evaluated. Lesion differentiation was investigated for lesions (i) with hyperintensity on DWI with b = 800 s/mm2 (n = 191) and (ii) with suspicious contrast-enhancement (n = 135). Results All lesions with suspicious contrast-enhancement appeared also hyperintense on DWI with b = 800 s/mm2. For task (i), best discrimination was reached for the combination of D 1′ and f 1′ using perfusion hot spot regions-of-interest (accuracy 93.7%), which was higher than that of ADC (86.9%, p = 0.003) and single IVIM parameters D 1′ (88.0%) and f 1′ (87.4%). For task (ii), best discrimination was reached for single parameter D 1′ using perfusion hot spot regions-of-interest (92.6%), which were slightly but not significantly better than that of ADC (91.1%) and D 2′ (88.1%). Adding f 1′ to D 1′ did not improve discrimination. Conclusions IVIM analysis yielded a higher accuracy than ADC. If stand-alone DWI is used, perfusion analysis is of special relevance. |
Full text from SpringerLink