| Popis: |
Purpose: To compare epithelium-removal and epithelium-disruption corneal crosslinking (CXL) methods in Fourier analysis of keratometric data and clinical outcomes. Methods: In this double masked randomized clinical trial, each eye of 34 patients with bilateral keratoconus was randomly allocated to either the epithelium-removal or epithelium-disruption CXL treatment groups. Ocular examination, refraction, uncorrected and best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (UCVA and BSCVA, respectively) measurements, and Pentacam imaging (keratometry, pachymetry, and Fourier analysis) were performed at baseline and at six-month follow-up period. Results: Patients' mean age was 23.3 ± 3.6 years. The preoperative thickness of the thinnest point was 459.20 ± 37.40 µm and 455.80 ± 32.70 µm in the epithelium-removal and epithelial-disruption CXL groups, respectively (P > 0.05). The corresponding figures were 433.50 ± 33.50 µm and 451.90 ± 39.70 µm, respectively, six months after the treatment (P = 0.0001). Irregularity component of the fourier analysis was 0.030 ± 0.016 µm in the epithelium-removal group and 0.028 ± 0.011 µm in the epithelium-disruption group preoperatively (P > 0.05). This measurement was 0.031 ± 0.016 µm and 0.024 ± 0.009 µm, respectively at month 6 (P = 0.04). The epithelium-disruption CXL group had better results in terms of the thickness of the thinnest point and the irregularity component as compared to the epithelium-removal group. The two study groups were comparable in spherical equivalent, mean keratometry, UCVA, BSCVA, or other Fourier analysis components (spherical R min, spherical eccentricity, central, peripheral regular astigmatism, and maximum decentration) (P > 0.05). Conclusion: This study shows that epithelium-disruption CXL is superior to epithelium-removal CXL regarding the short-term changes in pachymetry and corneal irregularity. Other evaluated parameters were comparable between the two techniques. |
