| Autor: |
Ana María Palmar‐Santos, Cristina Oter‐Quintana, Ricardo Olmos, Azucena Pedraz‐Marcos, Juana Robledo‐Martin |
| Jazyk: |
angličtina |
| Rok vydání: |
2023 |
| Předmět: |
|
| Zdroj: |
Nursing Open, Vol 10, Iss 9, Pp 6592-6601 (2023) |
| Druh dokumentu: |
article |
| ISSN: |
2054-1058 |
| DOI: |
10.1002/nop2.1919 |
| Popis: |
Abstract Aim To identify the presence of variability in the evaluation of case studies prepared by nursing students during their primary care rotations based on the existing evaluation rubric. To explore the difficulties experienced by link lecturers and students in preparing and evaluating case studies. Design A mixed methods study. Methods The scores for the rubric items and the final grades for the case studies were collected from a sample of 132 cases. Qualitative information was collected by conducting open‐ended interviews with lecturers and a focus group session with students. Results Statistically significant differences were identified between the lecturers' mean final grades [F(5.136) = 3.984, p = 0.002] and a variety of items in the evaluation rubric (p |
| Databáze: |
Directory of Open Access Journals |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Plný text