The Paradox of Anti-Democratic Arguments: a defence of democratic principles in debate
| Autor: | Bekesi B Aron |
|---|---|
| Jazyk: | English<br />Italian |
| Rok vydání: | 2023 |
| Předmět: | |
| Zdroj: | Science & Philosophy, Vol 11, Iss 2, Pp 84-94 (2023) |
| Druh dokumentu: | article |
| ISSN: | 2282-7757 2282-7765 |
| DOI: | 10.23756/sp.v11i2.1372 |
| Popis: | Conventional approaches in pro- or anti-democratic discourses often scrutinize the efficacy of leadership based on its outcomes, or explore the moral foundations of different systems. Contrary to these approaches, my argument presented in this paper is grounded in the inherent psychological desire to be heard and accepted. I posit that the essence of democracy resides in free discussion — a value even embraced by committed anti-democrats in the context of debates, as their acknowledgment hinges on it. This article presents an argument, developed based on my experience in actual debates called The Paradox of Anti-Democratic Arguments, to counter anti-democratic debaters who question the legitimacy of democratic norms. The article discusses the practical application of the argument in debates and casual discussions, its limitations and highlights the underlying psychological processes that make the argument effective in the context of Leon Festinger’s theory of cognitive dissonance. |
| Databáze: | Directory of Open Access Journals |
| Externí odkaz: |
|