Is underwater endoscopic mucosal resection of colon polyps superior to conventional techniques? A network analysis of endoscopic mucosal resection and submucosal dissection
| Autor: | Darren Jun Hao Tan, Cheng Han Ng, Xiong Chang Lim, Wen Hui Lim, Linus Zhen Han Yuen, Jin Hean Koh, Kameswara Rishi Yeshayahu Nistala, Khek-Yu Ho, Choon Seng Chong, Mark D. Muthiah |
|---|---|
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Rok vydání: | 2022 |
| Předmět: | |
| Zdroj: | Endoscopy International Open, Vol 10, Iss 01, Pp E154-E162 (2022) |
| Druh dokumentu: | article |
| ISSN: | 2364-3722 2196-9736 |
| DOI: | 10.1055/a-1633-3230 |
| Popis: | Background and study aims Evidence from recent trials comparing conventional endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) to underwater EMR (UEMR) have matured. However, studies comparing UEMR to endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) are lacking. Hence, we sought to conduct a comprehensive network meta-analysis to compare the efficacy of UEMR, ESD, and EMR. Methods Embase and Medline databases were searched from inception to December 2020 for articles comparing UEMR with EMR and ESD. Outcomes of interest included rates of en bloc and complete polyp resection, risk of perforation and bleeding, and local recurrence. A network meta-analysis comparing all three approaches was conducted. In addition, a conventional comparative meta-analysis comparing UEMR to EMR was performed. Analysis was stratified according to polyp sizes ( |
| Databáze: | Directory of Open Access Journals |
| Externí odkaz: |
|