Free-Hand versus Surgical Guide Implant Placement

Autor: Aysooda Afshari, Rojin Shahmohammadi, Seyed Ali Mosaddad, Ozra Pesteei, Emran Hajmohammadi, Mahdi Rahbar, Mostafa Alam, Kamyar Abbasi
Jazyk: angličtina
Rok vydání: 2022
Předmět:
Zdroj: Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, Vol 2022 (2022)
Druh dokumentu: article
ISSN: 1687-8442
01374303
DOI: 10.1155/2022/6491134
Popis: One of the most key areas of dentistry is dental implant surgery. The use of digital equipment and software in dentistry has developed considerably in recent years compared to other fields of medicine. Since examining the advantages and disadvantages of each approach, along with case studies, can help physicians make informed decisions, this review study aims to raise the awareness of dentists to make easier decisions about using guided or free-hand surgery. When planning for a dental implant, one of the most challenging questions that doctors face is which method to use (guided surgery or free-hand). Choosing the right method, such as other clinical considerations, will depend on the individual circumstances of each patient and the preference of the treating physician. Free-hand surgery is a cost-effective method in which the flap is reflected, and, according to the doctor's diagnostic information, an implant is placed, which in many cases is a useful method. Guided surgery has the highest level of accuracy and control, in which osteotomy is designed and printed through a digital surgery guide, and depending on the complexity of the case and the patient's anatomy, it has a higher level of value than free surgery. The surgical guide helps the surgeon make the implant surgery more accurate, safer, simpler, at a lower cost, and in less time. In fact, there are patterns that convey information about the position of the tooth to the dentist before the implant is placed.
Databáze: Directory of Open Access Journals
Externí odkaz:
Nepřihlášeným uživatelům se plný text nezobrazuje